top of page

The Science of Threat Assessment: How Behavior Analysis Helps Prevent Incidents

Threats don’t occur in a vacuum—they emerge as part of a pattern, often preceded by observable behaviors. 


Behavioral analysis is a scientific approach that enables organizations to identify and mitigate these risks before they escalate into critical incidents. 


For  law enforcement and security professionals, utilizing behavioral analysis techniques as part of a comprehensive threat assessment strategy can transform reactive responses into proactive prevention.


In this article, we’ll explore the science behind behavioral analysis, highlight its role in threat assessment, and provide actionable insights on how your organization can adopt these techniques to enhance safety and security.


What Is Behavioral Analysis in Threat Assessment?


Behavioral analysis in threat assessment is the systematic study of human behavior to identify patterns that may indicate a risk of violence or harm. 


By focusing on the psychological, social, and environmental factors influencing behavior, this approach offers a framework for  identifying potential threats and taking preventative measures.


Key Components of Behavioral Analysis


  • Pattern Recognition: Identifying behaviors that deviate from the norm.

  • Contextual Understanding: Analyzing behaviors within their specific environment.

  • Evidence-Based Assessments: Using structured professional judgement tools like WAVR-21 to ensure consistency and accuracy.


The Goal of Behavioral Analysis in Threat Assessment


A key goal of behavioral analysis in this context is to help organizations transition from a reactive incident management posture to proactive threat mitigation posture, fostering safer environments and reducing harm.


The Science Behind Behavior Patterns


Behavioral patterns are influenced by a complex interplay of psychological and environmental factors. Understanding these, and their potential impact on influencing violent behaviors, can help organizations identify risks early.


Psychological Drivers of Behavior


Understanding the psychological drivers behind behavior is an essential aspect for identifying the underlying motivations and triggers that can lead to potential risks.


Cognitive Biases


Cognitive biases can be described as mental shortcuts our brains take to process information more quickly, but they often lead to flawed decision-making. 


For instance, confirmation bias often causes individuals to seek out information that aligns with their existing beliefs, while ignoring evidence that contradicts them. This can result in overlooking critical warning signs or misjudging risks. 


On the other hand, overconfidence bias or the “overconfidence effect” can lead individuals to underestimate certain threats or to overestimate their abilities to manage situations, creating vulnerabilities in security or decision-making. 


Understanding and surfacing these biases through training and structured assessment tools can help mitigate their impact, enabling more proactive responses.


Mental Health Issues


Mental health challenges like depression, anxiety, or unresolved trauma can significantly influence behaviors. Individuals grappling with these issues may exhibit warning signs such as withdrawal, erratic actions, or preoccupation with negative thoughts. 


For example, depression can lead to hopelessness, which may manifest as disengagement or reckless behavior, while anxiety might result in heightened irritability or outbursts. 

 

A workplace or organization that provides mental health resources, such as counseling or employee assistance programs, can play a crucial role in addressing these challenges before they escalate into serious incidents.


Behavioral Leakage


Behavioral leakage refers to subtle, often unintentional signals that an individual may be planning or contemplating harmful actions. These cues can include veiled threats, excessive focus on grievances, fascination with past incidents of violence, or rehearsing violent scenarios. 


Behavioral leakage is often observed in conversations, written communication, or changes in demeanor. For instance, a person might repeatedly mention their grievances in a way that suggests fixation or reveals a growing fascination with weapons or violent ideologies.


Identifying and addressing behavioral leakage requires trained observers who can document and assess these signs within the broader context of the individual’s behavior, helping to intervene before a critical incident occurs. 


Further, organizations should enable the opportunity for coworkers or family members to report such behaviors, whether anonymously or publicly. 


Environmental and Social Influences


In addition to psychological factors, environmental and social influences can play a significant role in shaping behavior, often acting as catalysts for how individuals respond to stress, challenges, and their surroundings.


High-Stress Environments


Workplaces that operate under relentless pressure, such as those with consistently tight deadlines, high stakes, or limited resources, can create a breeding ground for negative behaviors. 


Chronic stress often leads to feelings of frustration, resentment, and burnout, which can erode morale and productivity. Employees experiencing prolonged stress may become disengaged, lash out at colleagues, or exhibit unpredictable behaviors. 


These environments also amplify the likelihood of conflicts and misunderstandings, further increasing tension and risk. 


Organizations need to proactively monitor employee well-being, foster open communication, and implement stress-reduction strategies to mitigate these precursors to concerning behaviors.


Cultural Contexts


Cultural norms and societal expectations significantly influence how individuals express or suppress their emotions and reactions. 


In some work cultures, openly addressing grievances or expressing anger may be discouraged, leading to internalized frustrations that could build over time. 


Conversely, in work cultures where assertiveness or competition is celebrated, individuals may feel empowered to act out aggressively to achieve their goals. 


Recognizing these dynamics is critical for threat assessment, as understanding these cultural contexts allows organizations to differentiate between typical behavior and potential warning signs. 


By fostering cultural competence and inclusivity, teams can better navigate these nuances to identify risks and address them effectively.


Core Principles of Behavioral Analysis


The foundation of effective behavioral analysis in threat assessment lies in its principles, which guide practitioners in gathering, evaluating, and acting on data.


Principle #1: Recognition and Early Detection


The cornerstone of behavioral analysis in threat assessment is recognition. 


Early detection relies on the ability of trained personnel to recognize subtle but critical behavioral changes that may signal potential risks. This proactive approach enables intervention before behaviors escalate into actionable threats.


Teams must be trained to spot and/or respond to red flags such as:


  • Increased Isolation or Withdrawal: An individual suddenly withdrawing from social interactions, avoiding peers, or neglecting responsibilities may indicate emotional distress or dissatisfaction. This behavior can precede more concerning actions, especially if combined with other red flags.

  • Expressions of Hopelessness or Anger: Frequent expressions of hopelessness, such as “Nothing matters anymore,” or outbursts of anger, can be indicative of internalized frustration or brewing resentment. These emotional signals often act as precursors to harmful actions.

  • Unexplained Changes in Demeanor: Abrupt shifts in behavior, such as becoming unusually secretive, agitated, or uncharacteristically disengaged, should not be overlooked. Such changes may point to stressors or grievances that require immediate attention.


The earlier these warning signs are recognized, the greater the opportunity to intervene constructively. Effective recognition requires training employees, managers or teams to recognize patterns and differentiate between harmless behaviors and potential risks.


Principle #2: Structured Risk Assessment


Recognition alone is not enough; structured professional judgment assessment tools ensure that the data collected is evaluated consistently and objectively. Tools like the Workplace Assessment of Violence Risk  (WAVR-21) provide a scientifically grounded method for assessing potential threats.


  • Objective Evaluation: WAVR-21 uses evidence-based criteria to evaluate the severity and immediacy of risks. Practitioners follow a standardized process to avoid subjective biases that could lead to misjudgments.

  • Identifying Patterns: Structured assessments allow teams to identify recurring behaviors or patterns over time. This longitudinal perspective can reveal escalating risks that might be missed in isolated incidents.

  • Reliability and Consistency: By using a standardized framework, tools like WAVR-21 ensure that assessments are replicable across different cases and practitioners, enhancing the reliability of the process.


With structured tools, organizations can help eliminate guesswork and ensure that assessments are based on evidence, not assumptions. This is particularly important in high-stakes environments where misjudging a threat can have dire consequences.


Principle #3: Collaboration and Data Analysis


The threat assessment process is rarely the work of a single individual—it requires a coordinated effort among diverse team members, each bringing unique perspectives and expertise. 


Collaboration is essential for gathering comprehensive information, analyzing risks, and implementing effective interventions.


  • Documenting Recognized Behaviors: A centralized system for recording behaviors of interest ensures that nothing slips through the cracks. Patterns often emerge when multiple inputs from different sources are combined.

  • Analyzing Trends Using Link Analysis: Advanced tools like Kaseware's link analysis feature allow teams to connect seemingly unrelated data points. For example, a series of minor incidents, when analyzed collectively, might reveal a larger, more concerning pattern of concerning behavior.

  • Secure Information Sharing: Sharing findings securely within the team and with external stakeholders, such as law enforcement or mental health professionals, ensures timely and coordinated responses while maintaining confidentiality.


Collaboration and data analysis are critical for building a full picture of potential risks. Without these, critical pieces of information may remain siloed, reducing the effectiveness of the threat assessment process.


Behavioral Assessment in Action


Proactive behavioral assessment has been instrumental in preventing incidents across various sectors by identifying and mitigating potential threats before they escalate. 


Here are some real-world scenarios illustrating its effectiveness:


Workplace Violence Prevention in Healthcare


The University of Texas at Houston Police Department established a Threat Management Team to address potential threats within their healthcare facilities. 


By assessing behaviors and implementing early intervention strategies, the unit successfully increased early reporting and prevented incidents, including suicide interventions and cases where individuals were at high risk of committing violent acts.


Behavior-Based Safety in Construction


Many construction companies throughout the world have implemented a Behavior-Based Safety (BBS) program to address high accident rates. 


By focusing on behavioral recognition and feedback, companies are able to identify critical behaviors leading to accidents. The implementation of BBS programs has led to a significant reduction in incidents, demonstrating the effectiveness of behavioral analysis in enhancing workplace safety.


Law Enforcement: Managing Stalking and Threats


The Los Angeles Police Department's Threat Management Unit (TMU) was established to handle cases involving stalking and threats. 


By assessing behavioral patterns and risks, the TMU has effectively managed and mitigated potential threats, preventing escalation into violence.


Best Practices for Implementing Behavioral Analysis


Adopting a successful behavioral assessment within an organization requires more than just policies and tools; it demands a strategic, multi-faceted approach to foster a culture of awareness and action. 


These best practices ensure organizations can effectively leverage behavioral assessment to identify risks and mitigate threats.


Build a Culture of Awareness


Awareness is a strong foundation for effective behavioral threat assessment. 


Organizations must create an environment where employees feel empowered and educated to recognize and report concerning behaviors.


  • Employee Education: Regular training sessions should focus on identifying behavioral red flags such as isolation, fixation on grievances, or unexplained changes in demeanor. Such programs should use real-world scenarios to make the training relatable and memorable.

  • Encourage Reporting: A transparent and well-communicated reporting system is crucial. Employees need to understand how to report concerns and be assured that their reports will be handled confidentially and without fear of retaliation. Anonymous reporting channels, if feasible, can further encourage participation.


When employees are actively engaged in spotting and reporting risks, organizations gain valuable insights into potential threats, often before they escalate.


Invest in Tools and Technology


Modern threat assessment relies heavily on robust tools and technologies that enhance the accuracy, efficiency, and reliability of behavioral assessment.


  • Structured Professional Judgement Assessment Tools: Tools like WAVR-21 provide a scientifically validated framework for evaluating behavioral risks, ensuring consistency, and reducing subjectivity.

  • Data Storage and Analysis Platforms: Platforms like Kaseware serve as a centralized hub for storing observations, reports, and data analysis. Further, through an integration with WAVR-21, Kaseware enables teams to access real-time data, streamline workflows, and make informed decisions faster.


For example: A school district using WAVR-21 and Kaseware could track a student’s behavioral changes over time, integrate data from multiple sources (e.g., teachers, counselors, OSINT sources), and act based on a more comprehensive amount of actionable risk data.


Train and Support Your Teams


Even the most advanced tools require skilled professionals to operate them. 


Continuous training ensures teams remain competent and confident in using behavioral assessments effectively.


  • Scenario-Based Workshops: Training sessions that mimic real-life situations help team members practice identifying and responding to behavioral red flags.

  • Role-Playing Exercises: By simulating potential incidents, such as an employee displaying erratic behavior, teams can refine their assessment strategies.

  • Ongoing Education: Threats evolve, and so should training. Providing regular updates on new methodologies, tools, and case studies keeps teams ahead of emerging risks.


Well-trained teams are better equipped to handle complex real-life scenarios, reducing the risk of missed warning signs or inappropriate responses.


Develop Cross-Functional Teams


Threat assessment is not the responsibility of a single department—it requires input from multiple and diverse perspectives to build a holistic risk picture.


  • Team Composition: Effective teams can include representatives from HR, legal, security, and mental health professionals. Each member brings their unique expertise, ensuring a balanced evaluation of potential threats.

  • Collaborative Decision-Making: Cross-functional teams foster better decision-making by integrating insights from multiple disciplines, avoiding blind spots that could arise from siloed assessments.


A workplace threat assessment team might use HR’s knowledge of an employee’s work history, legal’s understanding of compliance requirements, security’s expertise in physical risks, and mental health professionals’ insights into behavioral health.


How Kaseware Enhances Threat Assessment


For organizations seeking to operationalize behavioral assessments, Kaseware provides a comprehensive platform designed to enhance efficiency and collaboration.


Integration with WAVR-21


Our partnership with WAVR-21 simplifies structured risk assessments by enabling seamless integration between the WAVR-21 tool and the Kaseware platform. Organizations benefit from:


  • Evidence-Based Assessments: WAVR-21’s scientific framework, combined with Kaseware’s case management platform, ensures accurate evaluations.

  • Centralized Data Storage: Observations, assessments, and documentation are stored in one secure platform, reducing fragmentation and ensuring easy access.

  • Actionable Reports: Kaseware’s system generates detailed reports that decision-makers can use to implement targeted interventions.


Link Analysis for Better Insights


Behavioral risks often involve complex patterns that are not immediately obvious to the investigator or analyst. 


Kaseware’s link analysis feature connects the dots between disparate data points, providing deeper insights into potential threats.


  • Pattern Recognition: For example, link analysis might reveal that an individual’s grievance reports, changes in demeanor, and online activity all correlate across a historical timeline, signaling a potential risk.

  • Comprehensive Understanding: This feature allows teams to visualize the bigger picture, helping them prioritize high-risk cases.


Secure Collaboration


Collaboration among internal team members and external stakeholders is critical in threat assessment. 


Kaseware supports secure communication, ensuring sensitive data remains protected.


Efficient Teamwork: Teams can share insights, discuss cases, assign tasks or requests, and coordinate actions without delays.

Confidentiality: Advanced security protocols safeguard data, ensuring compliance with data privacy regulations and maintaining trust.


The Future of Behavioral Threat Assessment 


By prioritizing training, policies, resource allocation, and leveraging tools like Kaseware and WAVR-21, organizations can implement a proactive approach to behavioral threat assessment investigations. 


These practices not only enhance safety but also foster a culture of awareness and accountability, ensuring risks are identified and mitigated before they escalate.


Kaseware’s advanced platform enhances and accelerates these efforts by offering seamless integration, sophisticated analysis, and secure collaboration. Together, these tools and strategies empower organizations to stay ahead of behavioral threats in today’s ever-evolving threat landscape.


To learn more about the many ways Kaseware’s platform can support Behavioral Assessment in threat investigation initiatives, connect with us to schedule a demo.

bottom of page